Start a conversation
A/02Justice Audit – Investment Edition

Justice performance is part of the investment environment.

Examines commercial dispute resolution and enforcement, alongside the predictability and capacity of justice institutions. Identifies justice-system factors affecting investment risk.

A container port: cranes over stacked containers, a city across the water.
The transactions justice protectsA/02

Products availableCombination agreed to scope

The conversationFor development finance, investment agencies and governments

“What lies beneath the country’s headline rule-of-law score, and where does the justice system create – or reduce – investment risk?”

Who it is for
  • Development finance institutions
  • Development banks
  • Investment promotion agencies
  • Ministries of Economy
  • Chambers of commerce and business organisations
  • Investors
  • Governments and judiciaries
01The context

Capital needs confidence. Confidence needs evidence.

Investment depends on more than market size, infrastructure, labour and incentives. Investors need confidence that contracts can be enforced, property and assets protected, and commercial disputes resolved within reasonable timeframes.

Investors, governments and development finance institutions often assess the justice environment through national legislation, international indices and perceptions of the rule of law. These tell us something important. The Justice Audit asks a different question: what actually happens?

From rule of law to investment readiness

Developed by Governance and Justice Group (GJG) and Justice Mapping (JM), the Investment Edition examines how commercial justice works in practice. It combines institutional and case data with practitioner knowledge, business-user experience and geographical analysis. It does not rank countries or produce a composite score.

  • A law may provide for rapid enforcement of a commercial contract.

    How long does enforcement actually take?

  • A commercial court may exist.

    How many cases are pending, how quickly are they resolved – and what capacity does the court actually have?

  • A country may have modern investment and property legislation.

    Can businesses reliably access and enforce those rights when something goes wrong?

The entry offer

Start with a Commercial Justice Audit.

Discuss a Commercial Justice Audit

Rather than the entire Justice Audit, a tightly defined audit of the legal environment in which investment operates – measured across the five areas of commercial justice set out below.

Legal-framework assessments show what the law provides. The Commercial Justice Audit adds practical evidence of performance: how long commercial cases take, where they become stuck and how effectively judgments are enforced. It establishes an investment-climate baseline that can be repeated, and extended to the full Investment Edition.

02Five areas of commercial justice

What the Investment Edition measures.

The Audit can be configured around each country’s investment profile – extending, for example, to business and asset security: property and land disputes, registries and insolvency-related proceedings.

Five areas of commercial justice and illustrative measures
NumberDimensionIllustrative measures
01Commercial adjudication
  • Case duration
  • Clearance rate
  • Backlog
  • Adjournments
  • Judicial specialisation
02Enforcement
  • Time from judgment to enforcement
  • Enforcement success
  • Bottlenecks
  • Bailiff and enforcement capacity
03Institutional capacity
  • Judges
  • Human and material resources
  • Workload
  • Budgets
  • Infrastructure
04Digital readiness
  • E-filing
  • Electronic case management
  • Online access
  • Digital registries
05Predictability and accessibility
  • Publication of judgments
  • Procedural consistency
  • Legal costs
  • Business-user experience
03From audit to investment

Measure, map, diagnose, reform – track.

Instead of “contract enforcement is weak”, the Audit identifies where cases are delayed, why, which courts are affected and what can be changed.

  1. Measure

    Collect and validate data on how commercial justice operates.

  2. Map

    Visualise institutions, services, case flows and geographic differences.

  3. Diagnose

    Identify the bottlenecks creating delay, uncertainty and investment risk.

  4. Reform

    Translate findings into targeted, costed and prioritised interventions.

  5. Track

    Maintain the baseline and measure whether reforms improve performance over time.

04Key questions

The questions it answers.

Practical questions, answered from case data and institutional records – not from perception alone.

  1. How long does a commercial dispute actually take?

  2. Where do cases become stuck?

  3. How effectively are judgments enforced?

  4. Do commercial courts have sufficient judges and staff?

  5. Are filing and case-management systems digitalised?

  6. Are property and company records reliable and accessible?

  7. Do different regions present materially different legal risks?

  8. Does the system operate in practice as legislation suggests it should?

05Granularity

From country risk to actionable evidence.

Traditional indices are valuable for comparing countries at a high level. The Justice Audit provides the next layer down.

Where cases are delayed → why → which courts are affected → what happens at enforcement → what resources are missing → what can be changed

It can also reveal variation hidden by national averages. A country assessed as presenting significant legal risk may contain commercial centres, economic corridors or regions where justice institutions function considerably better – or worse.

For investors, this can inform location decisions and risk mitigation. For governments, it helps prioritise justice improvements relevant to investment.

06Investment infrastructure

Justice reform as investment infrastructure.

From the baseline, governments and partners can prioritise reform in case management, digitalisation, AI readiness and institutional capacity. Digitalisation is not an end in itself: the Audit establishes what needs to be digitised, why, and what measurable improvement it should produce.

  1. 01Roads move goods.
  2. 02Digital networks move information.
  3. 03Financial systems move capital.
  4. 04Justice systems protect the transactions on which all three depend.
07Outputs

What you receive.

Targeted, costed and prioritised – and a baseline that can be updated as institutions and investment conditions change.

  1. 01

    Commercial justice baseline

    A measured picture of commercial adjudication and enforcement – how long, how predictable, how well resourced.

  2. 02

    Subnational risk picture

    Commercial centres, economic corridors and regions where justice institutions perform better – or worse – than the national average suggests.

  3. 03

    Action Matrix and time-bound Roadmap

    Prioritised, costed actions in case management, digitalisation and institutional capacity, with responsibilities and measures of progress over time.

  4. 04

    A data asset, not just a report

    A baseline that can be updated as institutions and investment conditions change.

08Who uses it

Three users – one evidence base.

  • 01

    Governments

    Identify barriers to investment, prioritise justice expenditure, demonstrate reform progress and strengthen the investment proposition.

  • 02

    Development and investment partners

    Establish investment-climate baselines, target technical assistance, inform project preparation and measure results.

  • 03

    Investors

    Understand operational legal risk, test the assumptions behind national indicators, identify regional variation and inform due diligence.

09Track record

Evidence from the underlying method.

In Bangladesh, the national Justice Audit led the government to commission a Court Audit, which identified the causes of case backlog.

>30%

Estimated backlog reduction from the Case Management Orders that followed the Bangladesh Court Audit (2022). This example concerns the underlying method; it is not an Investment Edition result.

The Investment Edition applies the same principle: understand how justice works, and you can identify where investment risk occurs, target the reforms that reduce it – and measure whether they work. The Audit is participatory by design: national institutions and experts take part in data collection, verification, analysis and validation, and data and tools can be transferred so the evidence base is maintained nationally.

The Justice Audit … has demonstrated that investments at the policy level contribute to significant and far-reaching impact on the overall performance of the justice sector…

DFID Annual Review2021

Justice is not only a rule-of-law institution. It is investment infrastructure.

→Start a conversation

Start with the question you are facing.

Start with a conversation about a specific problem. Choose the one closest to yours and tell us a little about your context.

  1. 01Could a Justice Audit work in your country?
  2. 02Planning justice reform in the first 100 days?
  3. 03Preparing for EU accession?
  4. 04Examining justice and the investment environment?
  5. 05Need to understand court backlog or prison overcrowding?